Legal Opinion

Charbonnet v. Ochsner

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 29, 1971No. 50713PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIXON, Justice.

The plaintiff, an architect and contractor, brought suit to recover the balance he claimed for certain remodeling work on defendant’s residence. The defense set up in the answer was that certain of the work was defective, and the balance was withheld pending satisfactory correction and completion. Both plaintiff and defendant set up in the pleadings that an attempt was made to settle their differences ; the plaintiff contended that the compromise amount was contingent on prompt payment by the defendant; the defendant contended that the compromise amount was contingent upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pennington v. CampanellaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Charbonnet v. OchsnerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Delta Paving Company v. WoolridgeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Schroeter v. O'SteenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Walk Haydel & Assocs. v. Coastal PowerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Sam Parich v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  3. Elder v. Elder & Elder Enterprises, Ltd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Lytle v. Commercial Insurance Co. of Newark, NJLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Feingerts v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API