Legal Opinion
First Nat. Bank of Tulsa, Okl. v. Hoover
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 28, 1925No. 2370PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRandolph, J.
This is a second appeal in this case. For opinion on former appeal see 244 S. W. 1046.
Appellant, as plaintiff, filed this suit in the district court of Hemphill county, Tex., on July 25, 1921, alleging, substantially: That on or about the 15th day of April, 1920, T. V. Elzey executed and delivered to the Union National Bank of Tulsa, Okl., a series of notes as follows: Two notes each for $5,000, due August 1, 1920; three notes each for $5,000, due October 1, 1920; one note for $3,300, due October 1, 1920; and one note for $2,500, due October 1,. 1920, all bearing date April 15, 1920, executed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People's Savings Bank v. BatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Moore v. PiersonTexas Supreme Court · 1906
- Houston & T. C. R. R. Co. v. ShirleyTexas Supreme Court · 1880
- Texas Seed & Floral Co. v. Chicago Set & Seed Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Dunn v. PriceTexas Supreme Court · 1894
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Frank v. GiesyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- National Bank of Commerce v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1930
- Commonwealth, to Use v. Merchants Nat. BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- State v. Union Bag-Camp Paper Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Grange Nat'l Bank v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.