Legal Opinion

Denny v. Graeter

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1863PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Knox Common Pleas.

1Per curiam

Action by Graeter against Denny and wife, to foreclose a mortgage. Issue, trial by the Court, finding and judgment for the plaintiff

A new trial was asked on the ground that the finding was not sustained by the evidence, and that the amount found was too large. We perceive no error in these respects.

Again, it is urged that the Court had no jurisdiction, the title to real estate coming in question. Graeter had sold the premises to Denny, who, with his wife, executed the mortgage to secure the purchase money. It was alleged that Graeter had no title when he made the conveyance. Reply that he had…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Toner v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Brugh v. DarstIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Evey v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ewing v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Knarr v. ConawayIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Wilcoxon v. AnnesleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Peck v. HensleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1863

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API