Pullen v. School District No. 3
Oregon Supreme Court
Prom Multnomah.: George W. Stapleton, Judge. Department 1. This is a suit wherein it is sought to compel the immediate redemption and cancellation of a bond issue of the defendant school district, and to restrain the expenditure of the proceeds of the sale of such bonds for any other purpose than such redemption.
Read the full summary
Prom Multnomah.: George W. Stapleton, Judge. Department 1. This is a suit wherein it is sought to compel the immediate redemption and cancellation of a bond issue of the defendant school district, and to restrain the expenditure of the proceeds of the sale of such bonds for any other purpose than such redemption. The plaintiffs base their right to relief upon an alleged conspiracy on the part of all of the defendants, with the exception of the county treasurer, to foist upon the taxpayers of the district the burden of an illegal issue of bonds in the sum of $20,000. The wrongful acts of the…
1Opinion
Petition for Rehearing.
(187 Pac. 624.)
On petition for rehearing.
Rehearing Denied.
Mr. Ralph R. Duniway and Mr. James R. Rain, for the petition.
Messrs. Wilson & Guthrie, for respondent, School Dist. No. 3, contra.
Messrs. Teal, Minor & Winfree, for respondents, Keeler Bros, and Fred Grlenn, contra.
Mr. George W. Mowry, for respondents, Walter H. Evans, District Attorney, and John M. Lewis, contra.
BURNETT, J.
The petition for rehearing contends that this court should have directly examined into the question of whether or not certain electors who voted at the bond election mentioned in the pleadings…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Laubheim v. De Koninglyke Nederlandsche Stoomboot MaatschappyNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Farnham v. . BenedictNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Tazwell v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1913
- McMillan v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Luetzke v. RobertsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.