Legal Opinion

Mikula v. Ford Motor Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 30, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

HUDOCK, Judge:

The issue presented in this case of first impression is whether a new motor vehicle which was purchased out-of-state by a Pennsylvania resident who registers the car and pays insurance under Pennsylvania Law is subject to the provisions of Pennsylvania’s Automobile Lemon Law (Lemon Law), 73 P.S. section 1951, et seq. Because we find that the vehicle at issue is not covered under the Lemon Law, we affirm the grant of summary judgment in favor of Ford Motor Company (Ford).

The pertinent facts and procedural history may be summarized as follows: On or about April 2,1994, Susan…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Coker v. SM Flickinger Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Marshall v. Port AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Accu-Weather, Inc. v. Prospect Communications, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Schriver v. MazziottiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. DunsmoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API