Legal Opinion

Ralph E. Weeks Co. v. Arthur Kearney & A. W. Chesterton Co.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 10, 1973No. Civ. A. No. 72-141Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MUIR, District Judge.

This case presents a classic example of the inexcusable sedentariness which plagues our judicial system. As of this date, Plaintiff Ralph E. Weeks Company, Inc., has failed to respond in any manner to the interrogatories propounded on July 7, 1972 by defendants Arthur Kearney and A. W. Chesterton Company. Defendants have requested that this Court grant a continuance of the trial scheduled for January 16, 1973, or in the alternative that Plaintiff’s action be dismissed. The latter motion will be granted for reasons set forth below.

The Complaint in this case was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Charles Sivelle v. Fred N. Maloof, Fred N. Maloof v. Charles SivelleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967
  2. Fond Du Lac Plaza, Inc. v. ReidDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1969
  3. John F. Hastings v. Maritime Overseas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  4. Williams v. OwenDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1959
  5. Alvin M. Waters v. Dr. James v. LowryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API