Legal Opinion

Butler v. Miller

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 13, 1924No. Civ. No. 4639PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CABANISS, P. J., pro tem.

Plaintiff sued to recover for personal injuries suffered as the result of having been struck and run upon by an automobile truck driven by defendant Schneider, as the employee of defendant Miller. The verdict was in favor of defendant Schneider and against defendant Miller.

Defendant Miller moved for and was granted a new trial “on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict and upon the further ground that the verdict is against law”; and from this order plaintiff has appealed.

It has been repeatedly held by our courts that an order granting…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tweedale v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Bledsoe v. DecrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Wright v. Yosemite Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gaster v. HinkleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. Ewing v. HamadaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API