Legal Opinion

People v. Tadic

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 23, 1988PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Because defense counsel did not alert the trial court that it had not instructed the jury with regard to limiting its deliberations to the operability of the weapon at the time of the incident, as the court had indicated it would at the precharge conference, the court was prevented from rectifying the error and the defendant must be deemed to have waived any objection to the instruction provided (see, People v Whalen, 59 NY2d 273). In any event, the evidence of the defendant’s possession of a weapon at the time of the incident and its operability was overwhelming and, therefore, any error in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. SaundersNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. People v. CulhaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. People v. KnowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. BettisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API