Legal Opinion

Hedstrom v. Kingsbury

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1879PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Kent. Bill to set aside deeds. Complainants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.

The bill of complaint was filed in this case in aid of an execution levied upon certain lands. As against defendant G-aius P., relief was granted, and as against Malinda denied, and from the decree complainants appealed.

The bill avers that in August, 1875, Mr. Bennett, one of the firm of Kingsbury & Bennett, represented to complainants that Solomon 0. Kingsbury, one of the members of said firm, was worth about the sum of seventy-five thousand dollars in real estate; that he was authorized by Kingsbury to make this statement; that including the property conveyed to Gaius P. and Malinda he did…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cowan v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Smith v. TolmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Strauss v. ParshallMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Parker v. BarkenowitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Bartkowiak v. BartkowiakMichigan Supreme Court · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API