Legal Opinion

Ridley Township v. Pronesti

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 6, 1968No. Appeal, 166PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice O’Brien,

Appellant, Romana Pronesti, is the owner of a dwelling house located in an area zoned “B” Residential under the Ridley Township zoning ordinance. Her son, Vincent Pronesti, the other appellant, resides in his mother’s home and is licensed by the Commonwealth as a real estate broker. Vincent commenced the operation of a real estate broker’s office in the home and erected a sign on the premises to that effect. The township, contending that such a use was not permitted in a “B” Residential district, commenced an action in equity seeking to enjoin the operation. Vin…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Sherwood v. ElgartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Valicenti's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Taylor v. Churchill Valley Country ClubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DancerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Gilbert v. Korvette's Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. In Re Adoption of McCraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Prynn EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Commonwealth v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API