Hoskins v. Dodge County
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Dissent
VERGERONT, EJ.
¶ 47. (dissenting). I agree with the majority's analysis and conclusion on City of Beaver Dam's immunity from suit. I write separately because I do not agree with its analysis and conclusion on Dodge County's immunity. In my view there is a conflict between Deputy Steven Moul's deposition testimony, on the one hand, and Debra Krueger's affidavit and the Kruegers' statement to the DNR, on the other, and the conflict is a genuine issue of material fact. As the majority acknowledges, there is no dispute that the conditions on the lake were rough. Given those conditions, I conclude…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cords v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Linville v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- Lodl v. Progressive Northern InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000