Legal Opinion · Dissent

Zater v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 25, 1990No. A90A0877Published

1DissentBeasley, Judge

I concur in Division 2 but not in Division 1. Defendant is entitled to reversal because of violation of his right to be tried in a single prosecution pursuant to OCGA § 16-1-7 (b).

The transcript of the motion hearing establishes that the statutory “prosecuting officer” in the Barnesville Municipal Court had actual knowledge when that case was commenced that defendant was charged also with driving under the influence. The statute says “prosecuting officer,” not “prosecuting attorney,” so the first government representative to proceed was the police officer.

A prosecutor in Georgia is not…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  2. State v. McCrarySupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  3. Eady v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  4. McCrary v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  5. Waites v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API