Dighera v. Wheat

The appellees recovered judgment against the appellants in this action for the wrongful and malicious taking of corn which appellees claimed to be exempt to them as feed for their stock.

*459The errors complained of are: (1) The admission of evidence of Marcy and Hatcher, which consisted only in the presentation by each of a memorandum of the amount of corn delivered by appellees to appellant Wheat, which each witness had written off at the request of appellees, who were unable to make the memorandum. The circumstances were fully explained to the jury, and we do not see that the evidence could…