Legal Opinion

Rodriguez-Rivera v. Kelly

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 6, 2004PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the petition dismissed.

We agree with the dissenters below that the majority improperly substituted its credibility determinations for those of the Police Commissioner (Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443-444 [1987]), and that a rational basis exists in the record to support the Police Commissioner’s determination that petitioner failed to render all necessary police services. The Police Commissioner did not abuse his discretion in ordering the forfeiture of 15 days’ vacation time…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Berenhaus v. WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Kelly v. SafirNew York Court of Appeals · 2001

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dente v. MartinezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Calhoun v. KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Padilla v. KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Sanders v. State of New York Division of HousingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Amoros v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API