Legal Opinion

King v. Lexington Herald-Leader Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 21, 1958PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STANLEY, Commissioner.

The facts of this workmen’s compensation case are simple and certain. Only a law question is presented on a motion for an appeal.

The appellant, Claude R. King, an employee of the appellee, The Lexington Herald-Leader Company, after finishing his day’s work as a linotype operator in the afternoon of January 10, 1955, went to the first floor of the building, where the business offices are, out the front door and into a vestibule. There are several steps down to the street level and the outside door. The steps and the floor of the vestibule were slippery because of slush…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Phil Hollenbach Co. v. HollenbachCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  2. Big Elkhorn Coal Co. v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  3. Harlan Collieries Co. v. ShellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951
  4. Barres v. Watterson Hotel Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  5. Stearns Coal & Lumber Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ratliff v. EplingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
  2. Smith v. Klarer CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
  3. Charles R. Long, Jr., Paint Co. v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API