Legal Opinion

Lanham v. Meadows

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1913PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Braxton County. Action by Charles Lanham against Eva I. Meadows. Judgment for defenlant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

POEEENBARGER, PRESIDENT:

In this case, the jury denied by its verdict right in the plaintiff to recover any portion of the demands stated in his declara*611tion and bill of particulars, amounting to nearly five thousand dollars, consisting of three promissory notes and numerous sums of money alleged to have been paid out by him for her at her request.

Under the general issue raised by her plea of non assumpsit, the defendant adduced evidence tending to prove a long period of illicit sexual intercourse between her and the plaintiff, induced on her part by the advancement and payment of the money…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McMullen v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Embrey v. JemisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Coalmer v. BarrettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Larkin v. . HardenbrookNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  5. Fulton v. Crosby & Beckley Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Ex. Rel. McGilton v. AdamsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Horbach v. CoyleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  3. Baker v. CouchSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  4. Van Meter v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  5. Haymond v. HyerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API