Hefton v. Daniels
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Marian F. Penix, Judge.
The agency held Claimant to be ineligible for benefits under the provisions of Section 4(c) of the Arkansas Employment Security Law in that she was not actively seeking work and doing those things that a reasonably prudent individual would be expected to do to secure work. The Appeals Tribunal affirmed and found the Claimant’s availability for work is unduly restricted due to transportation, and she cannot be considered to be making a systematic and sustained effort to secure employment by doing those things that a reasonably prudent individual would be expected to do…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ross v. DanielsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
3Cited by4 opinions
- Buchanan v. Director, Arkansas Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
- Debnam v. Director, Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
- Stephanie Morgan v. Director, Division of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2024
- Shalea Isaace v. Director, Division of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2024