Legal Opinion

Haarmann v. Davis

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 23, 1981No. 12333PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BILLINGS, Presiding Judge.

In a two-count petition plaintiffs sought actual damages for breach of contract and *40punitive damages for fraudulent misrepresentation. Defendants filed a general denial to the petition and a third-party petition against a named corporation, seeking indemnification for any damages awarded plaintiffs.

The purported judgment from which defendants lodged this appeal is as follows:

“Now on this 27th day of May 1981, the Court having considered all the evidence and exhibits in connection with this case does hereby find in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendants and hereby…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haley v. City of Linn CreekMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Young v. RauppMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. MFA Mutual Insurance Co. v. Home Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Maurer v. ClarkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Chura v. Bank of BourbonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Hatch v. HootenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Warmann v. EbelingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Boyd v. Boone Management, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API