Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Rippee

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 28, 1993No. 18432PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant contends the trial court erred in entering a dissolution decree which did not value the “interest in his retirement plan” and “erred in the formula it applied to the division of the ... pension plan”.

For his first point appellant contends the court erred in not assigning a value to appellant’s interest in the retirement plan. Appellant does not cite us to any part of the record showing that he requested the trial court to make a finding on the value of the retirement plan and we have discovered no such request. Unless a request is made, the trial court is not required to make…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bentlage v. SpringgateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Carrier v. City of SpringfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Burrus v. BurrusMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Marriage of Harrison v. HarrisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Daniel Navarro v. Marisa NavattoMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Green v. DouglasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. In Re Marriage of WardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Shellenberger v. ShellenbergerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API