Commonwealth of Penna. v. Morris

Dissenting Opinion by

Trexler, P. J.,

The defendant could easily and accurately ascertain by reading the indictment what charge he had to answer. More than this is not required: Com. v. B. & O. R. R. Co., 35 Pa. Superior Ct. 474. He was accused of taking out of the county the property of Gr. M. Darrow with intent to prevent its being sold by virtue of an execution at the suit of Harrington v. Geo. E. Morris after levy had been made thereon, he knowing that the property had been levied on by G. M. Darrow, sheriff. It is evident that the statement that the property was that of Darrow referred to…