Legal Opinion

State v. Marcano

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 11, 1994No. 92-419PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorton, J.

The defendant, Raul Marcano, was convicted after a jury trial in Superior Court (O’Neil, J.) as a drug enterprise leader under RSA 318-B:2, XII (Supp. 1993). On appeal, the defendant argues: (1) that the trial court erred in admitting a non-testifying co-conspirator’s guilty plea, acknowledgment of rights form, and conspiracy indictment as evidence against him; (2) that the penalty provisions of the drug enterprise leader (DEL) statute unconstitutionally chilled his right to a jury trial by requiring him to reach a sentencing agreement with the State or to receive a mandatory twenty-five-year…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Chaffin v. StynchcombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  4. Corbitt v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. Jay Lewis Dworken, A/K/A Jason Lewis, Jay Lewis, United States of America v. William S. Gay, United States of America v. Steve RogoveCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fischer v. HooperSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  2. Clemmons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  3. State v. Joseph KuchmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API