State v. Marcano
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtHorton, J.
The defendant, Raul Marcano, was convicted after a jury trial in Superior Court (O’Neil, J.) as a drug enterprise leader under RSA 318-B:2, XII (Supp. 1993). On appeal, the defendant argues: (1) that the trial court erred in admitting a non-testifying co-conspirator’s guilty plea, acknowledgment of rights form, and conspiracy indictment as evidence against him; (2) that the penalty provisions of the drug enterprise leader (DEL) statute unconstitutionally chilled his right to a jury trial by requiring him to reach a sentencing agreement with the State or to receive a mandatory twenty-five-year…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Chaffin v. StynchcombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Corbitt v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Jay Lewis Dworken, A/K/A Jason Lewis, Jay Lewis, United States of America v. William S. Gay, United States of America v. Steve RogoveCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fischer v. HooperSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- Clemmons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- State v. Joseph KuchmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016