Legal Opinion

Ellison v. Ralston

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 1885PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court,. W. H, Horner, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This is an appeal by a garnishee from the decision of the court refusing to tax in his favor the costs of his answer as garnishee. Three separate notices of garnishment were issued and served in the same case, one against George A. Madill and Thomas E. Ralston, in their character of co-partners as Madill and Ralston; one against George A. Madill individually, and one against Thomas E. Ralston individually. Interrogatories were filed in each of the three proceedings, and the garnishees made separate answers in each. Thereafter the plaintiff dismissed the proceeding against Madill individually,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. EvansSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  2. Walton v. WaltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1854
  3. Smarr v. McMasterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1863

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Great Southern Life Insurance v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Mertzlufft v. Bunker Resources Recycling & Reclamation, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Max Stovall Construction Co. v. Villager Homes, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Schafer v. RobertsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Barnard & Lease Manufacturing Co. v. Monett Milling Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API