Legal Opinion

DeBold v. Township of Monroe

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 11, 1971Published

1Opinion of the Court

114 N.J. Super. 502 (1971)

277 A.2d 404

WILLIAM DEBOLD, GEORGE FULLER AND FREDERICK SMITHLINE, TRUSTEES IN LIQUIDATION OF CAMBRIDGE DEVELOPMENT CORP., A NEW JERSEY CORP., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

TOWNSHIP OF MONROE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, MONROE PLANNING BOARD AND JOSEPH INDYK, INDIVIDUALLY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued April 27, 1971.

Decided May 11, 1971.

Before Judges LEWIS, MATTHEWS and MINTZ.

Mr. Stanley Tannenbaum argued the cause for appellants (Messsr. Reibel, Isaac, Tannenbaum & Epstein, attorneys).

Mr. Richard…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Debold v. Township of MonroeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  2. Debold v. Township of MonroeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API