Legal Opinion

Hill v. Trezevant & Cochran

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 3, 1916PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Lawrence Circuit Court, Eastern District; R. E. Jeffery, Judge; Appellant, Hill, was released when the new bond was given. The judgment is erroneous; clearly against all the evidence.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, C. J.

The plaintiffs, Trezevant and Cochran, are general agents for insurance companies and in the year 1901 appointed J. N. Beakley local agent at Walnut Ridge, Arkansas. They exacted a bond from Beakley and the latter executed a bond in the sum of $500.00 with P. B. Hill and H. L. Ponder as sureties, the condition of the obligation .being that said Beakley would “faithfully and punctually pay over, at Balias, Texas, to said Trezevant & Cochran, all sums due or that may become due to them, as general agents aforesaid, from time to time, for moneys collected or received •by said agent for premiums…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Union Indemnity Co. v. Benton County Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  2. Morrilton v. MooseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API