Legal Opinion

McCreight v. City of Camden

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 31, 1897PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Petition, in the original jurisdiction of this Court, by William R. McCreight against F. R. Zemp, as mayor, and W. F. Malone, W. G. Wilson, and D, E. Hinson, as aider-men, composing the city council of the city of Camden, for an injunction, restraining them from issuing certain city bonds.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Pope.

This is an application for the writ of injunction addressed to this Court in its original jurisdiction. -The petitioner is a citizen and taxpayer of the city of Camden, in this State, and the respondents, as the mayor and aldermen of said city, compose its city council. The city council, being about to issue $10,000 bonds for public purposes, and there being some doubt entertained as to their power to do so, this proceeding was begun, to restrain such issue of bonds. The pleadings are somewhat extended, and, therefore, we will not…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re State to Issue Bonds to Fund IndebtednessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Williams v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  3. Nettles v. CantwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1919
  4. In Re Application of StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Jordan v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API