Legal Opinion
Krom v. Comerford
New York Court of Appeals
Decided September 3, 1982PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the matter remitted to the Family Court of Ulster County for further proceedings. Both that court and the Appellate Division held, in reliance on our decision in Matter of Nehra v Uhlar (43 NY2d 242), that the petitioner was required to establish extraordinary circumstances as a predicate for any change in the prior custody order. While this case was on appeal we held in Friederwitzer v Friederwitzer (55 NY2d 89, 95) that “Nehra’s phrase ‘absence of extraordinary circumstances’ is to be read as ‘absence…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Friederwitzer v. FriederwitzerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Weiss v. WeissNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Nehra v. UhlarNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Priebe v. PriebeNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Milici v. MiliciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wilson v. McGlincheyNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Grunwald v. GrunwaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Ladizhensky v. LadizhenskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Rivera v. FowlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Alberta V. v. Charles C.New York Family Court · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.