Legal Opinion
LeClaire v. Commercial Siding & Maintenance Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided March 9, 1992No. 91-276PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Justice.
The issue in this case is whether the complaint of the appellant, Christopher M. LeClaire, stated facts upon which relief can be granted. LeClaire sued the appellee, Commercial Siding and Maintenance Company (Commercial), for damages for personal injury allegedly resulting from negligent entrustment of a motor vehicle. The Trial Court granted Commercial’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Ark. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We hold the complaint stated facts upon which relief can be granted.
The complaint alleged that Commercial owned the vehicle in which LeClaire was a passenger when…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Elrod v. G & R Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- National Bank of Commerce v. HCA Health Services of Midwest, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Stafford v. Far-Go Van Lines, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Mason v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- Ernest B. Collins, Individually and as Next Friend of Vicki Lynn Collins, a Minor v. Arkansas Cement CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms International, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- Mann v. OrrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Collins v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
- Collins v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
- Collins v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.