Legal Opinion

McKenna v. Meehan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 3, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Malley, J.

But one of the points raised on this appeal merits consideration. It relates to a matter of procedure. In this action in equity the court has entered judgment without making a formal decision as prescribed by section 440 of the Civil Practice Act. The question presented is whether under all the circumstances the trial justice had power to enter judgment without making such decision.

Ordinarily such procedure would result in an invalid judgment requiring the remission of the cause to Special Term for correction. (Smith v. Geiger, 202 N. Y. 306, 312; Brewster v. Brewster Co., 204 id. 687;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. . GeigerNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Lowenthal v. . LowenthalNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Olmsted v. OlmstedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  4. McKenna v. MeehanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Aufiero v. AufieroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  2. Murphy v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API