Legal Opinion

King v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 21, 1968No. 41071PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.

The offense is fondling; the punishment, IS years.

The evidence adduced by the state reflects that appellant stopped at the yard of the house where the eleven year old boy named in the indictment was getting a Christmas tree out of a station wagon and, after asking the child for a match and receiving it, put an arm around the boy’s back and fondled the boy’s sexual parts with his other hand.

Testifying as a witness in his own behalf, appellant denied having fondled the child and testified that he patted him on the back after the boy asked him for a dime.

The jury…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Toms v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1947
  2. Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
  3. Gill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
  4. Vaughn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
  5. Route v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nichols v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. Penix v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. Crisp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Mahaffey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  5. Ingram v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API