Legal Opinion

Killgore v. Carmichael

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1903PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From Umatilla: W. R. Ellis, Judge. Suit to establish a boundary line by J. F. Killgore against George Carmichael, resulting in a decree for plaintiff, from which this appeal is taken.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Moore

This is a suit to ascertain and establish a controverted boundary between adjacent lands. It is alleged in the complaint that plaintiff is the owner of the southeast quarter of section 33, in township 5 north of range 35 east of the Willamette Meridian, and that defendant owns the southwest quarter thereof; that a controversy exists between the parties hereto concerning the line dividing these tracts of land; that for more than twenty years prior to 1898 the line was marked by a fence beginning at the southwest corner of plaintiff’s land,' and running thence to the northwest corner, thereof,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. O'Hara v. ParkerOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Kitcherside v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Goodman v. MyrickOregon Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Vandusen v. ShivelyOregon Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. FrazierOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Bowsman v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Nicholas v. Title & Trust Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1916
  4. McDowell v. CarothersOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Galbraith v. ParkerArizona Supreme Court · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API