Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Barlow

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 2, 1997No. 86 0099; CA A91405PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Husband appeals a judgment modifying his spousal support obligation from $1,100 per month to $900 per month. He contends that the trial court should have terminated the support obligation entirely, because wife has retired and enjoys both retirement benefits and lower living expenses. On de novo review, ORS 19.125(3), we affirm.

The parties were married for 31 years. At the time of the 1986 dissolution, wife was 64 and employed as a social worker, earning $1,500 per month. She began that work approximately six years earlier, after spending the previous 20 years at home as a homemaker, raising…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Marriage of Blake v. BlakeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of FrostCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. In re the Marriage of StutzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API