Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Zahka

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1917PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action to recover plaintiff’s share in a certain bond and mortgage after same has been satisfied.

1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.

This case was tried before the court, a jury being waived. There is no disputed question of fact, all the facts being conceded. Briefly, they are these: The plaintiff owned a mortgage on real property for $3,500, which she assigned to the defendants as security for a loan of $2,000, which they made to a party named Plaisantin; the assignment on its face *336was absolute; at the time it was given a participation agreement in the usual title company form was executed, by which the defendants were declared to hold a prior interest in the mortgage to the extent of $2,000 and the plaintiff a…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. James v. MoreyCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1823
  2. Jaffray v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Booth v. . PowersNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Potter v. . Merchants' BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  5. Henry v. . HerringtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1908

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harber v. HarberSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  2. Yates v. FergusonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Clare v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Pillsbury v. EarlyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1929
  5. Thomas v. ZahkaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API