Legal Opinion

David v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 24, 2007No. Civil Action 02-1145 RWR/DARPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DEBORAH A. ROBINSON, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiffs [Darlene David’s] Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (Document No. 82) (“Plaintiffs Motion”) is pending for determination by the undersigned. 1 Upon consideration of the motion, the memoran-da in support thereof and in opposition thereto, and the relevant portions of the record herein, Plaintiffs motion will be granted in part, and Defendant Davis will be ordered to pay Plaintiff Darlene David her costs, including reasonable attorney’s fees, in accordance with the findings set forth herein.

BACKGROUND

Pl…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Smith v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  5. Briggs v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. David v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  2. Bode & Grenier, L.L.P. v. KnightDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  3. Robinson v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  4. David v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  5. Craig v. LewDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API