Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Stout

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 2007No. 77369-6Published

1Concurrence

¶34 (concurring) — Although I concur in the result reached by the majority, I am disturbed by the majority’s attempt to sever the right to confrontation from the right to cross-examination in determining what process is due in a sexually violent predator (SVP) proceeding. I agree with the majority that the confrontation clause does not mandate a right of confrontation in civil proceedings. However, the right to be heard and to confront witnesses is considered fundamental to a fair trial, even in the civil context, where an important right is at stake. Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 92 S.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API