Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Little v. County of Suffolk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 24, 1979Published

1Concurrence

Hopkins, J. P.,

concurs in the dismissal of the appeals from the order but

otherwise dissents and votes to affirm the judgment, with the following memorandum: On the motion for summary judgment the defendant county proved that the highway in issue was not a county road. No opposing evidence was produced by the plaintiffs that in fact the highway was a county road. The affidavit submitted on behalf of the defendant town did not state that the highway was a county road, and it did not deny that in fact the highway was a town highway. A town is liable for damages resulting from defects in a town…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Malcuria v. Town of SenecaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. Woodcock v. County of NiagaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Rupert v. Town of West SenecaNew York Court of Appeals · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API