Legal Opinion

Muela v. Moye

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 30, 1916No. 591PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from El Paso County Court; Adrian Pool, Judge. Proceedings by Max Moye against Caye-tano Muela. From an interlocutory order appointing a receiver, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory order of the county court of El Paso county, appointing J. Harley receiver of a brindle bull dog named Richard.

Max Moye filed his petition herein on January 19, 1916, and averred that he was the owner of a certain brindle bull dog about three years of age; that said bull dog answers to the name of Richard, and is the same bull dog which was given to him by one R. H. Simms, who resides in Las Cruces, N. M.; that the said brindle bull dog was-given to plaintiff by the said R. H. Simms about 14 months previously and was kept by the plaintiff on his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Powdrill v. PowdrillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Ft. Worth v. Capps Land Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  2. Rowe v. Watkins, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2010
  3. Davenport v. Wood Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Dawson v. Heid Bros.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Motley v. Tom Green CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API