Legal Opinion
Palmer v. City of Rome
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 17, 1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
John R. Tenney, J.
In this medical malpractice action, plaintiff seeks an order requiring defendant to produce certain pathological reports pursuant to CPLR 3111. and 3124. Defendant Harper examined tissue removed from plaintiff’s left breast and diagnosed intraductal carcinoma. Based on this diagnosis a modified radical mastectomy was thereafter performed.
Subsequently, the defendant hospital sought an evaluation of Dr. Harper’s work for the purpose of assisting the board of managers “in determining whether or not to continue their relationship with Dr. Harper and his…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lenard v. New York University Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Larsson v. MithallalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Carroll v. St. Luke's Hospital of NewburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Burnside v. Foot ClinicsNew York Supreme Court · 1982
3Cited by4 opinions
- Samper v. University of Rochester Strong Memorial HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1987
- Spencer Sav. Bank, SLA v. Excell Mortg. Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Slotnik v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1985
- Kraut v. WestNew York Supreme Court · 2000