Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Lawton

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 2004No. 95802Published

1DissentJustice Fitzgerald

I strongly agree with the majority that Lawton’s ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim lacks merit. I strongly disagree with the majority that section 2 — 1401 provides a new procedural avenue for a defendant committed under the Sexually Dangerous Persons Act (SDPA) to assert an abandoned ineffective-assistance claim.

To obtain relief under section 2 — 1401, the defendant must show both a meritorious defense to the charges against him and due diligence in presenting it. See People v. Pinkonsly, 207 Ill. 2d 555, 565 (2003). Generally, a meritorious defense under section 2 — 1401 involves…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. MacCollomSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Best v. Taylor MacHine WorksIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  5. People v. FloresIllinois Supreme Court · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API