Legal Opinion

Narciso v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 14, 2012No. 27104PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Toal

Oseil Gomez Narciso (Petitioner) appeals his conviction for trafficking cocaine, and asserts that the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress drug evidence seized by police during a routine traffic stop. Following his conviction, Petitioner signed a Consent Order Granting Belated Direct Appeal (Consent Order) and waived his right to raise any other post-conviction relief (PCR) allegations. Petitioner requests this Court remand his case to determine whether that waiver was entered into knowingly and voluntarily. We affirm the circuit court’s order denying Petitioner’s motion to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Herring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  2. Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  3. State v. CardwellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
  4. State v. CheeksCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  5. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API