Mills v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We reverse Appellant’s sentence and remand for resentencing under a corrected scoresheet.
It was error to score 21 points for being under legal constraint as there is no testimony or written evidence before the court that Appellant was under any type of constraint at the time of the offense. Brown v. State, 632 So.2d 1052, 1053 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). See also Schott v. State, 641 So.2d 465 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Blanton v. State, 546 So.2d 1181, 1183 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).
It was also error to score points for two juvenile felony commitments that show on their face that Appellant was not represented…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Cooper v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Schott v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Dickerson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mills v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Polanco v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998