Margoley v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 1 — PKESENTMENT AND MOTION — APPEAL PROM BRECKINRIDGE CIRCUIT COURT. cited 2 Revised Statutes, 407; Constitution Ky., Rev. Stat., page 152, secs. 6, 8 and 12.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Stites
In April, 1860, Margoley, who was a licensed tavern-keeper, and had executed a bond, with one Pate as his surety, for the performance of his duties as tavern-keeper, was tried and convicted of a breach of his obligation, and adjudged to pay a fine of three hundred dollars.
*406Afterwards the attorney for the Commonwealth notified the surety, Pate, that he would move against him, at the ensuing October term of the circuit court, for a judgment against him for the like sum, as the penalty of the bond. Upon the calling of th„e cause Pate tendered his answer, controverting the allegations of the…
2Cited by21 opinions
- F. J. Harrison & Co. v. BoringTexas Supreme Court · 1875
- Brinkman v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
- Center v. P. & M. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
- Vaughn v. TracySupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
- Emmons v. WhiteMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.