Legal Opinion

Haynes v. King

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 19, 1951No. 39099Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing

MOISE, Justice.

Mr. Justice Hamiter was tolerant in that he subscribed to the granting of a rehearing, feeling that the importance of the case justified this action even though he was convinced of the correctness of his original opinion.

We now seek the reason why this matter has become so controversial in the process of its judicial development when the pleadings and the judgment appealed from demonstrate the issues necessary for a decision. Furthermore, there is no- dispute of facts revealed in the evidence. Not a single witness contradicted any other witness, yet,, there is a…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. McDuffie v. WalkerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  2. Long-Bell Petroleum Co. v. TriticoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  3. Goldsmith v. McCoySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  4. Baird v. Atlas Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  5. Bremer v. North Central Texas Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1936

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API