Commonwealth v. Oblender
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
.APPEAL BY W. C. KNEEZEL, ADME., EROM THE COURT OE QUARTER SESSION'S OE LANCASTER COUNTY. No. 223 January Term 1890, Sup.
Read the full summary
.APPEAL BY W. C. KNEEZEL, ADME., EROM THE COURT OE QUARTER SESSION'S OE LANCASTER COUNTY. No. 223 January Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 129 August Term 1887, Q. S. On December 7, 1889, after trial and verdict in the case of Commonwealth v. Oblender et al., in the Court of Common Pleas, reported on appeal, etc., to this court, ante, p. 530, where the facts relating to the present controversy will sufficiently appear, William C. Kneezel, administrator c. t. a. of Philip F. Blessing, deceased, moved the Court of Quarter Sessions “ to strike off the entry of forfeiture entered on the back…
1Per curiam
Philip F. Blessing was bail for Adam Oblenderin the Quarter Sessions of Lancaster county for his appearance to answer a charge of embezzlement. The recognizance was forfeited in that court. Blessing is deceased, and his administrator obtained a rule to show cause why the forfeiture should not be stricken off. This rule the court below discharged, and this appeal was taken by the administrator from that order.
We are of opinion that no appeal lies in such case.
It was decided in Bross v. Commonwealth, 71 Pa. 262, that an appeal does not lie from the orders or judgments of the Quarter Sessions in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bross v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. FogelmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897