Legal Opinion

Sisters of the Sorrowful Mother v. Zeidler

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 7, 1938No. 27780PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.

This is an action to recover damages for the alleged wrongful death of Bertha Garrett. The action is prosecuted by and in the name of Carl F. Zeidler, administrator of the estate of said deceased.

Plaintiff’s petition alleges, among other things, that the defendant, Sisters of the Sorrowful Mother, is a private corporation, duly, and legally incorporated under the laws of the state of Wisconsin and registered in Oklahoma as a hospital, and that it is now, and was prior to August 1, 1934, operating for profit under the name of St. John’s Hospital at Tulsa.

That on August 1, 1934, the said Bertha…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Mobile Infirmary Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. City of Shawnee v. RoushSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Southern Methodist Hospital & Sanatorium v. WilsonArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  4. City of Okmulgee v. CarltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. City of Pawhuska v. BlackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. President & Directors of Georgetown College v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  2. Spivey v. St. Thomas HospitalCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
  3. Rabon v. Rowan Memorial Hospital IncorporatedSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Durney v. St. Francis Hospital, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1951
  5. Gable v. Salvation ArmySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API