Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. Cram

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1855PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion to strike out plaintiffs reply.

1Opinion of the Court

Morris, Justice.

The complaint is in assumpsit for goods sold and delivered on the 12th of October, 1854, and avers, u That thereupon the defendant is now indebted to the plaintiffs in, and the plaintiffs demand judgment against the defendant for $523.05, with interest thereon from October 12th, 1854.”

The answer of the defendant admits the purchase of the goods, &c., and avers they were purchased upon a credit of six months, and that the credit had not expired.

This allegation in the answer is not “ A statement of new matter constituting a defence,” but is merely a special denial of the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jones v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1868
  2. Hogen v. KlaboNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
  3. County of Cayuga v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1920
  4. Heman v. McNamaraMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API