Legal Opinion

Christopher Wertz v. State of Indiana

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 7, 2015No. 48A04-1409-CR-427PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBB, Judge.

Case Summary and Issue

[1] Christopher Wertz brings this interlocutory appeal, challenging the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. He,presents ope issue, which is a matter of first impression: whether the warrantless search of his personal Garmin Global Positioning System (“GPS”) device violated the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. 1 We conclude Wertz’s GPS device is not a “container” under, the automobile exception and that he has a reasonable expectation of privacy in the device and its contents. Therefore, the warrantless search of the GPS device…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Robert Weathers v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Lonny Hodges v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Marcus Zanders v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Albert Thomas Thorne, III v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Centennial Lending Group v. Seckel CapitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API