Layman v. Layman
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
731 S.W.2d 771 (1987)
292 Ark. 539
Carol Ann LAYMAN, Appellant,
v.
William Joseph LAYMAN, Appellee.
No. 86-269.
Supreme Court of Arkansas.
June 29, 1987.
Hall, Wright, Morris & Tharel, by David E. Morris, Fayetteville, for appellant.
Stanley, Harrington & Watson by Jeff H. Watson, Springdale, for appellee.
HAYS, Justice.
The issues presented by this appeal of a divorce suit are 1) whether stock in a family corporation was a gift to the husband, 2) whether the increased value of that stock became marital property and 3) whether an alimony allowance was adequate. We affirm on points 1 and 3 and reverse on…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Day v. DaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Potter v. PotterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- Hull v. HullMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Cockrill v. CockrillArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re Marriage of KomnickIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.