Legal Opinion

Layman v. Layman

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 29, 1987No. 86-269Published

1Opinion of the Court

731 S.W.2d 771 (1987)

292 Ark. 539

Carol Ann LAYMAN, Appellant,

v.

William Joseph LAYMAN, Appellee.

No. 86-269.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

June 29, 1987.

Hall, Wright, Morris & Tharel, by David E. Morris, Fayetteville, for appellant.

Stanley, Harrington & Watson by Jeff H. Watson, Springdale, for appellee.

HAYS, Justice.

The issues presented by this appeal of a divorce suit are 1) whether stock in a family corporation was a gift to the husband, 2) whether the increased value of that stock became marital property and 3) whether an alimony allowance was adequate. We affirm on points 1 and 3 and reverse on…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Day v. DaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Potter v. PotterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Hull v. HullMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Cockrill v. CockrillArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  5. In Re Marriage of KomnickIllinois Supreme Court · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API