San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Circuit Judge.
This case presents the question, inter alia, as to whether the likely environmental consequences of a potential terrorist attack on a nuclear facility must be considered in an environmental review required under the National Environmental Policy Act. The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”) contends that the possibility of a terrorist attack on a nuclear facility is so remote and speculative that the potential consequences of such an attack need not be considered at all in such a review. The San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace and other groups disagree and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Department of Transportation v. Public CitizenSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Andrus v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Tri-Valley Cares v. U.S. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone v. Connecticut Siting CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace v. Nuclear Regulatory Com'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Western Watersheds Project v. KraayenbrinkDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2008
- Sierra Forest Legacy v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.