Legal Opinion

San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 1, 2006No. 03-74628PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Circuit Judge.

This case presents the question, inter alia, as to whether the likely environmental consequences of a potential terrorist attack on a nuclear facility must be considered in an environmental review required under the National Environmental Policy Act. The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”) contends that the possibility of a terrorist attack on a nuclear facility is so remote and speculative that the potential consequences of such an attack need not be considered at all in such a review. The San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace and other groups disagree and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Department of Transportation v. Public CitizenSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Andrus v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Tri-Valley Cares v. U.S. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone v. Connecticut Siting CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  3. San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace v. Nuclear Regulatory Com'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. Western Watersheds Project v. KraayenbrinkDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2008
  5. Sierra Forest Legacy v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API