Legal Opinion

Flexlume Sign Co. v. Opalite Sign Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 30, 1923No. Nos. 3031, 3032PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVAN A. EVANS, Circuit Judge.

Appellant instituted two suits to restrain the infringement of certain patents and to recover damages for unfair competition. It also sought to restrain the infringement of its trade-mark “Oplex.” The two suits, though separate, were tried together in the District Court; both defenses being conducted by the Opalite Sign Company. We will dispose of both in one opinion.

The infringement of three patents was charged in the complaint, but only two are here urged, No. 1,146,910 and No. 1,224,253, both to Wiley and Hough. The former is a process patent, while the latter…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Northam Warren Corporation v. Universal Cosmetic Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1927
  2. Federal Electric Co. v. Flexlume CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1929
  3. Federal Electric Co. v. Flexlume Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API