Legal Opinion

State v. Pierro

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 23, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

BAIME, J.A.D.

This case presents novel questions concerning the scope of Evid.R. 65. This rule permits introduction of evidence affecting the credibility of a declarant whose out-of-court statement has been admitted under an exception to the hearsay rule. We hold that evidence of the defendant’s threats resulting in the declarant’s refusal to testify and recant his previously admitted declaration against penal interest may be introduced. We also hold that when impeachment evidence is admitted under Evid.R. 65, the trial court should instruct the jury…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Boyde v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. United States v. Stuart Steven NobleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  3. State v. JohnsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
  4. State v. HillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
  5. United States v. Jose Luis Pizarro and Miguel RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. SegoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API