State v. Pierro
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
BAIME, J.A.D.
This case presents novel questions concerning the scope of Evid.R. 65. This rule permits introduction of evidence affecting the credibility of a declarant whose out-of-court statement has been admitted under an exception to the hearsay rule. We hold that evidence of the defendant’s threats resulting in the declarant’s refusal to testify and recant his previously admitted declaration against penal interest may be introduced. We also hold that when impeachment evidence is admitted under Evid.R. 65, the trial court should instruct the jury…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Boyde v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Stuart Steven NobleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- State v. JohnsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- State v. HillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
- United States v. Jose Luis Pizarro and Miguel RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. SegoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993